Poisoning rhino horns
Ed Hern, owner of the Rhino and Lion Reserve near Johannesburg, made a statement claiming that he was planning to inject the horns of the rhinos on his game reserve with poison in an effort to deter poachers. Ed Hern stated that: “The aim would be to kill, or make seriously ill anyone who consumes the horn”.
Comment from Save the Rhino
A poisoned chalice
Against the background of a 15-year high in rhino poaching (over 150 animals killed in South Africa in the first 7 months of 2010), Ed Hern, owner of the Rhino and Lion Reserve near Johannesburg, plans to inject the horns of his rhino with poison, so that if the rhino is subsequently poached and its horns smuggled to Asia, anyone using Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) made with these horns would be killed or seriously injured.
My primary concern would be that poisoning rhino horns, with the stated desire of killing or injuring anyone subsequently ingesting it, must be regarded as attempted murder. Yes, it is illegal to poach rhinos, it is illegal to trade in rhino horn, and China and Vietnam, for example, are signatories to the CITES agreement banning the trade in rhino horn. But that is not the point. In the UK, even if a burglar breaks into your house and threatens you with violence, you are not entitled to kill them. It would be extremely hard to defend a case of murder via poisoned horn, even though the horn would have been acquired / used illegally.
However, if you ignore the ethical and legal issues involved, then there is some validity to the idea.
Firstly, it would be very easy (if expensive) to implant a toxin in rhino horn. You could mix the toxin with something like dental acrylic and drill a lot of holes through the horn and fill them up with the acrylic / toxin mix. There are probably other good ways to do it. Cyanide may not be the best toxin to use; others may be more stable or less toxic to the rhino. Some research would have to be done. Rhinos do rub their horns against trees and rocks, and for the animal’s safety, it would be important that the horn powder, which could be inhaled or ingested by the rhino, does not then kill the rhino. A plant toxin which is relatively non-toxic to rhino but highly toxic to people would probably be a better option. (Black rhino have an ability to ingest some very toxic plants and this may also be applicable to white rhino.) Some poisons remain stable for a period of years, but as horns grow continually, it would be necessary to repeat the treatment occasionally for the deterrent to remain effective. Tranquilising a rhino is expensive, and every time an anaesthetic is used, there is a small risk that the animal might not come round.
Even a tiny amount of some poisons (such as strychnine, 1080, botulism toxin, ricin and anthrax) are incredibly potent and it is conceivable that even the minute amount ingested in TCM remedies could be fatal, or at least cause serious illness.
If it were legal and legitimate to poison the horns, then one should start with all exported trophy heads, i.e., animals that have been legally hunted and for which export licences have been sought and approved. One should also poison all rhino horns held in strong-rooms and museums (there have been several thefts of rhino horn from such venues in the last couple of years) and all those legally sold at auction throughout the world (which must be pre-1947 and “worked”, i.e., carved or mounted).
You’d then need to decide whether to poison rhino horns secretly and arrange for some to be leaked into the illegal trade network so that a few end users became ill or died; or whether to publicise the fact that horns were routinely being poisoned, and perhaps stop the trade by generating a kind of “voodoo” around rhino horns.
The most absurd thing in the whole sorry saga of rhino poaching is that rhino horn does not actually work! It is used by TCM practitioners supposedly to bring down fevers, when an aspirin would do the job and much more cheaply. Some Vietnamese people apparently believe that rhino horn cures cancer. It doesn’t. It’s made of keratin, the same protein that is found on our hair and nails. If you want to try it out, chew someone else’s toenails: don’t poach a rhino.
Ed Hern has made a bold claim and attracted a lot of press coverage. It’s good to see rhino poaching getting media attention. But I think this is a red herring. It distracts us from the real needs: more resources for anti-poaching and rhino monitoring teams; training of the judiciary so that they understand the seriousness of wildlife crime and impose commensurate sentences; a coordinated and better-funded effort by Interpol, national police forces and illegal trade investigators; and trying to reduce the demand for rhino horn in TCM-using countries.
Cathy Dean Director Save the Rhino International
Add a comment
Related News Stories
-
More than 150 rhinos killed in South Africa this year
March 2012More than 150 rhinos have been killed in South Africa this year. This is almost double the figure released only a month ago, and almost half of the total number of rhinos killed in the entire of 2010
-
Discussions on whether a moratorium on rhino hunting is needed
October 2011In a recent statement Minister of Environmental Affairs, Edna Molewa, said that she intended to “engage with the various provincial Environment MECs to look at the possibility of placing a moratorium on the hunting of rhinoceros.” She said that this was o
-
UK government calls on rhino horn consumer countries to act, via CITES meeting in Geneva
August 2011The UK government is calling on East Asian countries to mount 'appropriately targeted' awareness-raising campaigns to dispel the myth that rhino horn is an effective type of medicine, against a backdrop of alarming levels of rhino poaching.
-
Time Magazine article - Killing Fields: Africa's rhinos under threat
June 2011A recent article in Time Magazine highlights the current rise in rhino poaching and the increasing Asian demand and illegal trade which is driving the current crisis.
(5) Comments
I agree with everything that Cathy notes here. The unfortunate fact in all this is that the poachers and the syndicates they work for do not use the horn themselves and don't much care about the health of the end users. Poisoned or not, it won't deter poaching and it won't stop Rhino horn from being sold as medicine. Any adverse affects would be put down to other reasons and will not deter users. There are also far too many dangers to the Rhinos and potentially unintended consequences to other wildlife. One wrong doesn't right another wrong. This method is wrong. Education is still the key.
The situation is so critical that it calls for drastic action.
Rhino horn should be changed from an item that has high demand and value to something that someone is scared of consuming.
It's a generational thing. Right now grandpa tells the young ones about the "miraculous" healing powers of Rhino horn. Once enough old farts in Vietnam and China consume Rhino horn and fall seriously ill the word will get about the killing power of Rhino horn.
The myth will then change to Father warning his son how grandpa fell ill and had to be hospitalized after consuming Horn from a now dead Rhino.
Serves the Rhino horn consumers right. They deserve it for killing thousands of endangered Rhino's every year just for their horns.
Anybody stupid enough to think rhino horn will cure them of the flu deserves whatever they get. This is an ENDANGERED SPECIES we are talking about! There are too many stupid people and not enough Rhinos. If they get sick maybe they will stop buying it. I agree that education is the key but there is an urgency to this and rhinos can't wait to be safe.
We can try boycotting all products from countries who demand illegal animal products too. Don't buy any Korean cars, Chinese products, clothes made in Vietnam. Let them know that civilized people won't support their corrupt mentality any longer. They cook dogs alive in Asia and so obviously have no empathy. But they do love their money.
People like you are stupid as well. Way to stick to stereotypes to generalize a whole entire race of people.
I hope someone like you never gets any form of a spotlight, as you'll just end up doing more bad than good for any public cause.
Anyway, this is pretty much the same as condoning murder to justify the protection of endangered species. And an idea like this will probably do nothing to stop illegal poaching, let alone I wonder what the effects of the poison would do on the surrounding natural environment if not the rhinos themselves.
I think much of the concept of justice is underscored by an eye for an eye.
It is a crucial aspect of the idea of consequences for ones actions.
The poisoning of the Rhino horns is very much a desperate but necessary measure in a losing battle against tenacious and greedy criminals, as well the very dumb and malicious consumer on the other side. This an act of animal genocide that needs to have the severity of capital punishment by poisoning loom over the heads of those that are perpetrators.
I am glad the Rangers and Protectors are doing this. I hope they think of ways to do this for all creatures that are being hunted to extinction for bull***t potions in the east.